DISQUS

liza · 2 months ago

the copywriting errors in this post, they burn! i so need an editor. anyhow, will come back later to fix :P

Dr. Candi Wallace · 2 months ago

Your analysis is brilliant. The reason Polanski's victim, Lohan, and neverending images of pubescent girls in "ho shoes" find no taboo resonance with the creative elite is because they represent female "wannabes" and "nevergonnabes" that the elite look down on, yet depend upon for their monetary approval. They are the eternal groupies that cannot become even arm candy, though haute couture promises that if their hooker clothes and shoes are sufficiently "haute," it may be possible.
The selection of Lohan is unfortunate. Lohan has made herself synonymous with the uneducated, spoiled and self-destructive nouveau riche. The Arch/Lohan collaboration seems a desperate to attempt create buzz from irrelevance. I am old enough to be Lindsay's mother. I have daughters 21 and 18. If Estrella Arch ever expects to sell anything to my daughters, future film maker and engineer, respectively, or to their daughters, she better come with a more powerful representative than Lohan, because their "not us" is fast becoming our "not them."

Muhammad Tariq Veder · 2 months ago

Dear blogdiva, how true is what ya blo about exploiation and absolution... to hell with these phaedophiles and rapists and I´m saying this as a father of six ranging from 10-22 (two girls four boys) we have to speak out! thks newmtv (twitter)

newmtv · 2 months ago

My dear sister Blog Diva, you´re so damn right and we have such a long, long road to travel... luckily we´re not alone... and if one day all the "others" join us... the world will live as one, inshallah. hugs&love mtv